Shifting from a Samsung Galaxy Note 9 into a LG Stylo 4 is analogous to Moving from a Ferrari 812 Superfast into Some Kia Optima. They’re both 2018 smartphones with styluses constructed in, and they both operate the exact same version of Android (Oreo 8.1). However, other than that, they couldn’t be more different.

The Stylo 4 includes a quarter of the Note 9’s internal storage (32GB vs 128GB), is made from plastic instead of glass, and is powered by a far slower processor. And it does not have wireless charging or a double camera or a WQHD+ touchscreen screen.

But much like the gap between a Kia and a Ferrari, the Stylo 4 offers something the Galaxy Note 9 doesn’t: worth. And like I utilized the 250 handsets (the lowest priced Android phone I have used in some time) as my main device for a fortnight, I began to see just how narrow the lines between top, funding, and mid-sized phones really are. I didn’t scale my usage (in fact I set up the Stylo 4 from my ruling backup), and while I will admit the Note 9 ran circles around the Stylo 4 at nearly every speed test, once you break it down, the two phones really are not all that different.

So, do we actually need to spend $900 or $1,000 to find the best Android phone? Or to put it another way: Is your Galaxy Notice 9 really 400 percent better than the Stylo 4?

Ever since the very first Android phone came, we have been conditioned to expect a substantial speed boost every 12 weeks. But while the progression is clear in the high end of the current market, with all the Snapdragon 821, 835, 845, etc., it’s a bit more muddled for low-end and mid sized phones.

The Stylo is powered by a Snapdragon 450 processor from 2017, and its own era surely shows. Even when comparing it to the newer Snapdragon 636, which runs at the same 1.8GHz clock speed, the Snapdragon 450 is decidedly outdated, with a slow GPU and modem, and a powerful image signal chip. So it’s clearly slower than the Snapdragon 845 within the Note 9, and considerably so. The Snapdragon 636 will be slower too, but not as noticeably.

The biggest issue is with graphics functionality. It is something I was especially attuned to because I’d literally changed to the Stylo 4 in the ruling 9. Nonetheless, once per week, it was not quite as bothersome.

Programs which were initially slow to load became quicker after their initial launches, and even with only 2GB of RAM, shifting became noticeably less syrupy following a day or 2. Additionally, I started to anticipate when the system would hang, so my palms didn’t jump to some other undertaking and slow down things much more.

Auto-rotate was most affected by the Stylo 4’s low-end specs–so much so I turned on orientation lock. However, overall, the graphics were a hassle than a hindrance. The slowness is compounded by LG’s UX skin, which adds unnecessary clutter and interface oddities throughout. I can not help but wonder just how much quicker the Stylo 4 would sense if it conducted Android One like the G7 One. That said, I’ve got a new appreciation for the Note 9’s Adreno 630 GPU, which makes things buttery simple despite the Samsung Experience UI.

Everyday speed performance can be noticeable slower than it is on the Note 9, but again, I adjusted my expectations after just a couple of days. I’ve been using Snapdragon 845 phones for the greater part of 2018, so I guessed the Stylo 4 could be slow to the point of unusable. Nevertheless, it wasn’t. I missed the speed of the Note 9 for certain, but it did not feel as a $750 difference. Moreover, most people purchasing a Stylo 4 will be coming from a comparable category of telephone, and also the Stylo’s Snapdragon 450 is certainly faster than the Snapdragon 429 or 210 they are likely switching from. The Stylo 4 could be slow, but it is by no means unusable.

I was most impressed with all the Stylo 4’s battery life. Having a 3,300mAh capability, I expected it to be so-so, particularly coming out of the Note 9’s impressive 4,000mAh battery, but I was pleasantly surprised. Rarely did I must plug into the Stylo 4 until the end of a day, and even then, I generally had more than 10 percentage staying. Benchmarks were not so kind, revealing approximately 7 hours, however this a case where real-world usage is vastly superior.

Unapologetically plastic vs. breakable glass


As you’d expect, the Stylo 4 is made from plastic rather than this Note 9’s all-glass layout, and while it feels less considerable compared to Samsung’s thousand-dollar flagship, it has a nice construct that feels far from economical. The curved display and plastic back rests comfortably in my hand and pocket compared to the Note 9, and I wasn’t nearly as concerned about falling it without a situation. .